AI revolution: So big, Texas grid needs the equivalent of 30 Nuclear Reactors By 2030 to meet Power Demand

Data centres and Electricity demand,

By Jo Nova

The insatiable hunger for electricity

The world is about to flip from an energy diet to an electrical boom. Look at Texas.

Here in Australia our top Blob Scientists tell us it will take 15 years to build one nuclear plant. But in Texas, which has two nuclear plants already, the AI revolution is beating down the door, and it’s saying “Feed me 30 plants for breakfast ” — or at least by 2030. It’s like a different planet.

There are already 340 datacentres in Texas which use 8GW of power, but new projects are so large, they are starting to ask for a whole gigawatt up front. And the sum total of requests for new electrical supply add up to 99 gigawatts — most of which have materialized in the last year. The new level of demand is so big, the grid managers are starting to worry that single new industrial loads are large enough to threaten the grid.

We’re talking of a seismic shift:

The ERCOT grid peak load last summer was 86 gigawatts. The new peak demand by 2030 is expected to be 75% bigger. It may not all be nuclear, ERCOT did ask for “the equivalent” of 30 new nuclear plants. But it will be big and fast.

Texas has 31 million people. Australia has 26 million (plus a million foreign uni students). We’re performing a national pantomime over whether it’s realistic to build a few nuclear plants and a couple of SMR’s, as if we’re plotting to build the first colony on Venus. Meanwhile Texas is leading the revolution.

Texas Needs Equivalent of 30 Reactors to Meet Data Center Power Demand

Financial Post

“We’ve never existed in a place where large industrial loads can really impact the reliability of the grid, and now we are stepping into that world.”

[Bloomberg]— Demand on the Texas power grid is expected to expand so immensely that it would take the equivalent of adding 30 nuclear plants’ worth of electricity by 2030 to meet the needs.

That’s according to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, which manages the grid. The forecast is based on the addition of new data centers needed to power artificial intelligence. And it’s raising concerns about whether infrastructure in the state will be able to expand fast enough — and at what cost.

ZeroHedge

Individual projects are already starting to request 1 gigawatt of power and they pose new risks to maintaining a stable grid, said Agee Springer, Ercot’s senior manager of grid interconnections. A gigawatt is typically enough to power 250,000 homes in Texas.

Ercot said it’s gotten requests equal to 99 gigawatts for new connections to the grid from big power users, including data centers, bitcoin miners and hydrogen producers, according to an internal grid presentation Thursday. That’s up from 40.8 gigawatts last March.

There’s a big question as to whether infrastructure can be built fast enough because of supply chain issues, resulting in long wait times for things like big turbines to produce electricity and other key equipment such as transformers. Another critical issues is who is going to pay for all of this build out.

One company is already planning to build 30 micronuclear plants. Another wants to develop molten salt reactors.

None of the AI teams are begging for wind or solar power. If Australia were to build new coal plants, or new nuclear plants  with spare capacity, Big AI would be here in a flash. The La Trobe Valley could become a world leading AI centre if the government was willing to keep using the 300 years of cheap brown coal there. At 3 cents a kilowatt hour wholesale, it’s still the cheapest electricity on the planet.

Do we want to be the coal and iron mine at the edge of the world, or would we like to ride the revolution?

 

10 out of 10 based on 38 ratings

25 comments to AI revolution: So big, Texas grid needs the equivalent of 30 Nuclear Reactors By 2030 to meet Power Demand

  • #
    Just+Thinkin'

    Re-Newables should be able to handle this.

    No worries.

    /sarc

    140

  • #
    Neville

    Thanks again Jo for trying to wake us up, but unfortunately the Labor , Greens, Teals loonies want to destroy Eastern Australia to build toxic, unreliables like W & S and keep re-building every 15 to 20 years.
    Bloomberg tells us this would cost us trillions of $ and all wasted forever and zero change to our climate by 2050 or 2100 or ….?
    If this isn’t barking mad, then what is it?

    150

    • #
      Skepticynic

      >If this isn’t barking mad, then what is it?
      Yes it is barking mad, and utterly so, until you adjust your premise.
      If the objective is to destroy what we have and what our parents and grandparents have built, to the point we have lost and we invite new owner/managers in to please run the show, because as part of our self-destruction we’ve made noble efforts to leave plenty of our wealth buried for the benefit of our new overlords, then it doesn’t seem quite so staggeringly bonkers. Relax, everything is under control. But not under our control.

      70

  • #
    RickWill

    Do we want to be the coal and iron mine at the edge of the world, or would we like to ride the revolution?

    These are not mutually exclusive. Do both.

    I would never propose moving out of coal and iron ore to focus on AI. I believe AI is still in the fad stage. Not much different to solar power, BEVs and lithium batteries a decade or two back. Each of these technologies have found an economic niche but not the game changers that they were supposed to achieve.

    The place to be now is developing a nuclear power capability while building more coal fired plants in the Latrobe Valley that will power Australia for the next 50 years. Export the high rank coal while burning the lignite here in state of the art power plants.

    But Blackout has already locked taxpayers into footing the bill for 8GWh of batteries, a major new pump hydro in addition to Snowy 2 and 4GW of new solar and wind. The tenders have been accepted so the funding guarantees locked in. Dutton needs a plan to unravel all of that.

    110

    • #
      Eng_Ian

      I’d much prefer that we took that coal and that iron ore and produced the steel for the world. All rolled into completed structural sections and forged into the spanners and hammers. I’d also prefer the bauxite to be refined to the aluminium alloys that the world demands, casting and cold drawing the sections and plate ready for our industrial centres to make into the goods the world demand.

      Instead…. we’re just the ones who dig the holes in the ground and ship the goods to others so that we can buy them back at greatly inflated prices.

      There’s no value adding in Oz. It’s too damned expensive to even contemplate now.

      140

      • #
        pcourtney

        Mr. Ian: All you need is a man like Andrew Carnegie, and a government that stays out of his way. I bet AU is well-stocked with the first, if you had the second part.

        10

    • #
      ianl

      The last paragraph is a key example of the intractable mess created by our political timidity. By that I mean the Aus voting patterns.

      With an Elbow minority government, the Greens/Teals holding the lower house balance and the Greens with the balance in the Senate, devolution seems assured.

      A Dutton minority government will likely be no better off, as the small raggedy parties such as Hanson’s seem always to suffer people who defect once elected. Even wet Liberals would be sufficient to cause deadlock.

      00

  • #

    Why is AI so important to build lots of power production for?

    Better to spend the $$$ into the Lunar and Mars expeditions instead.

    20

  • #
    Neville

    Mark Mills in this short 26 minute video tries to explain what is required to build data centres in the immediate future.
    This is from 2 months ago.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohzqrECEjYY&t=12s

    10

  • #
  • #
    Dennis

    Dutton Plan Nuclear

    A multi-billion dollar facility guaranteeing high-paying jobs for generations to come

    A zero-emissions nuclear plant will provide thousands of high paying jobs for coal power station workers, along with opportunities for local businesses to provide goods and services in the construction and operational phases, injecting millions of dollars into the local economy for up to 100 years.

    An integrated economic development zone attracting manufacturing, value-add and high-tech industry

    New industrial zones will be established and anchored to zero-emissions nuclear plants, enabling host communities to offer Australia’s cheapest, cleanest and most consistent 24/7 power, attracting:

    High value manufacturing (e.g. defence and other speciality equipment, smelting);

    Mineral processing (e.g. critical mineral processing and speciality metal refining);

    High-tech sectors (e.g. datacentres).

    Zone tenants will pay lower wholesale electricity prices and avoid network costs because they will have a direct power connection to the plant.

    20

    • #
      Ross

      Dennis, you could change a few words in that Dutton plan statement and it would ably describe a plan based on building new HELE type coal plants, without nuclear. The last 4 points already describes our present grid if current assets were just retained and upgraded.

      10

    • #
      wal1957

      I googled dutton “dutton how much renewable energy”.
      Amazing results!
      All results on 1st page is from pro renewable media, you can guess what their commentary is.
      Goodle state that google is not biased.
      I say google is full of BS!

      10

  • #
  • #
    Neville

    Never forget that all of the panic is because co2 now makes up about 0.014% MORE of our atmosphere than it did in 1800 and is still a tiny trace gas.
    It was about 0.028% before the IR and today it’s about 0.042% and Nitrogen is about 78% , Oxygen is about 21% and Argon is about 0.9% =99.9%.
    So water vapour, co2, methane, nitrous oxide etc make up the last 0.1%. BUT W V is much higher in the tropics and very little at the poles.

    https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=1ARR%2fZp0&id=7A5109DF33BAD9706BC81304910827E76B067113&thid=OIP.1ARR_Zp06PMaRNf9mgkXlwHaH0&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2fthumbs.dreamstime.com%2fz%2fcomposition-air-vector-illustration-gas-structure-educational-scheme-separated-pie-percentage-parts-nitrogen-oxygen-carbon-184419510.jpg&exph=1690&expw=1600&q=gases+in+the+atmosphere+pie+chart&simid=608043245591929709&FORM=IRPRST&ck=CE41FF00879A7EFE2D41EA0791A180B1&selectedIndex=0&itb=0&idpp=overlayview&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0

    10

  • #
    Yancey Ward

    Let us assume the numbers of what is needed are accurate, then none of this will ever be built. Such numbers are so expensive that the profits from such data centers simply will not be able to cover it.

    20

  • #
    Neville

    Here’s the proof from Dr Rosling’s BBC video that we owe everything to FF energy today when the UK started the IR about 200 + years ago.
    All that extra wealth and health in just the last 0.1% of Human history and all told in under 5 minutes.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbkSRLYSojo&t=11s

    00

  • #
    David Maddison

    The Al-bozo Government wants to promote AI in Australia but are too clueless to understand that it doesn’t run on wind, solar or Unicorn flatulence.

    It needs real coal, gas, nuclear or real hydro (not SH2).

    https://www.minister.industry.gov.au/ministers/husic/media-releases/australian-first-ai-plan-boost-capability

    10

  • #
    David Maddison

    AI is one of the principal weapons of the Left to control the flow of information and to promote propaganda, such as through biased Goolag search results and to do censorship on Leftist platforms like Farcebook and YouTube (which have become slightly less censorious since TRUMP was inaugurated as he threatened them with sanctions if they didn’t stop censoring and banning conservatives).

    It’s interesting that this weapon of the Left can’t use the power systems so beloved of the Left like wind, solar and Unicorn flatulence.

    It needs real coal, gas, nuclear or hydro power or they can’t control us.

    Oh well, just another case of Leftist hypocrisy and Doublethink (the acceptance of contrary opinions or beliefs at the same time, especially as a result of political indoctrination).

    00

  • #
    David Maddison

    Back in the day, people involved with computers knew the concept of GIGO. Garbage In, Garbage Out.

    Now, many people, including so-called professionals like scientists, engineers, lawyers, doctors etc. actually believe what AI tells them. It must be so much worse with your typical low information Green Labor Teal voter (i.e. people who may vote yet are generally poorly informed about issues according to Wiki definition).

    00

  • #
    Forrest Gardener

    I wonder whether any of the data centre promotors has heard of a Carrington Event.

    And the nuclear push becomes all the more urgent when 300 years of Latrobe Valley coal faces a factor of 10 in increased electricity demand and becomes a 30 year reserve.

    Oh well as long as Australia heads away from anything which requires large amounts of energy or electronic circuitry…

    … come the apocalypse the nation will become a superpower.

    10

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>