Sunday

7.7 out of 10 based on 19 ratings

129 comments to Sunday

  • #
    MeAgain

    UQ vaccine trials – participants still throw a positive for HIV: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/participant-in-uq-covid-vaccine-trial

    50

    • #
      James Murphy

      I read that as IQ vaccine trials…
      if such a thing existed, one would assume that our politicians have been safely and effectively inoculated.
      Journalists were in phase 2.

      210

    • #
      David Maddison

      Presumably the false HIV+ result would exclude such people from employment in the military (or perhaps other professions) or as blood or organ donors.

      51

    • #
      Broadie

      Includes a link to power couples Canberra Times 2014

      The WHO was in bed with the ABS so to speak:

      5. Jane Halton PSM, Department of Health secretary since 2002, and Trevor Sutton, deputy Australian statistician leading the ABS 2017 Group.

      Australia’s leading international health advocate, Jane Halton, is in charge of implementing a $60 billion budget, with responsibility for advice on and administration of Medicare, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, aged care and private health insurance among other issues.

      “Essentially I am involved in all of the complex decisions made by government in the health portfolio and the minister [Peter Dutton] relies on my advice. In the end, he forms his own opinions, but I need to put all the facts before him …”

      The longest serving current secretary at a single department, Professor Halton wields global influence as chairwoman of the World Health Organisation’s executive board and former five-year chairwoman of the OECD’s health committee.

      After coming to national attention as the convener of the People Smuggling Taskforce in the Children Overboard Affair more than a decade ago, Professor Halton is now tipped to be a leading candidate for the pending Finance Department secretaryship.

      Her husband is Trevor Sutton, one of three deputy Australian statisticians at the Bureau of Statistics, and the one responsible for the 2016 census.

      “Our aim is to have the majority of Australian households (65 per cent or more) complete their census online, with whatever device they choose … This will represent a doubling of the rate of online participation achieved in 2011,” Mr Sutton said.

      While cabinet ultimately choose the questions to run in a census, Mr Sutton’s ABS 2017 group provides the advice on content after community consultation.

      In a busy portfolio dominated by demographics, Professor Halton said her husband’s expertise was sometimes useful.

      “We don’t talk a lot about work at home but as I am accessible to staff and government 24/7 inevitably there will be work-related phone calls or emails received at home. And yes, I do take advantage of Trevor’s statistical experience from time to time.

      21

    • #
      Eng_Ian

      If it is a false positive for HIV, what happens if they actually get the disease?

      Is there another test or will they just go on with their life unaware, potentially infecting others, ten maybe? One false positive has implications for more than just the one person from the test.

      71

  • #

    https://joannenova.com.au/2025/03/its-a-100-flip-reuters-suddenly-is-skeptical-on-climate-policy/
    Reuters has the message of truth.
    Thank you, Jo.

    Pity it hasn’t been read at Kew: –

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn89v3de683o
    Kew to open garden focusing on climate crisis

    [BBC, of course]. “Kew Gardens will open a new “ground-breaking” garden in July that explores the urgent need to tackle the climate crisis.”

    There is an urgent need to tackle the crisis in the UK caused by our Government’s [dictated??] Climate Policies [like ‘Nett Zero’, per Mr. Miliband, a colossal waste of hard-earned taxpayers’ money].
    More –
    “The garden, approved by Richmond Council last year, will have a striking display of plants reflecting the dramatic rise in average global temperatures over time.”
    “There will also be a dry garden with drought-resistant plants to show how nature can be used to adapt to climate change and a rain garden which will highlight ways to manage water flow, prevent soil erosion, reduce flooding and put moisture back into soil.”
    But – Nature DOES adapt to climate change – and ‘ways to manage water flow, prevent soil erosion, reduce flooding and put moisture back into soil’ are good things in themselves, generally – and not restricted to ‘Climate Armageddon’!

    Yet more –
    “In the garden, at least 26 new trees will be planted, chosen for their resilience to predicted future climate conditions.”
    ‘Predicted’ – I wonder how close these predictions will be.

    Our Bed-wetting Catastrophists aren’t usually even in the right parish.
    I do hope the trees won’t suffer because of being unsuitably planted in London.

    But it’s the BBC … so ‘Science’ – ‘show me’ – takes a second place, at best, to dogma.

    Auto.

    220

    • #
      John F. Hultquist

      Of the 1.35 visitors per year to Kew Gardens, 97% won’t care.
      There is no urgent need to tackle a crisis that doesn’t exist.
      I like plants and have some that don’t grow well. Ponderosa Pine do fine, Western Larch (commonly called Tamarack here) grow but are not happy. Tomatoes say “Not here, buddy.”

      160

    • #

      Mother Nature is a lot more resilient than the ‘Climate Alarmists’.

      Look at how many trees and the vegetation that somehow survived the Ice Ages and managed to grow back in places where the ice sheets were once a mile thick.

      A little bit more warmth is a good thing IMHO. And more CO2 BTW.

      The cold kills more people than the heat and crops don’t do very well in freezing temperatures.

      The people at the BBC and other Woke Organisations need to go back to school on Monday and learn some basic General Science.

      250

    • #
      Greg in NZ

      An Antipodean Conundrum:

      The mythical predicted cr!s!s equals zero or even less, with South Pacific cyclone numbers and energy well-below what has been before, despite Alfred’s lingering presence off SE QLD.

      https://tropical.atmos.colostate.edu/Realtime/index.php?loc=southpacific

      NZ’s blocking high has so far rebuffed 2 troppos’ attention (ex-Rae & ex-Seru) sending them on their diminished way, and so far has kept Alfred stalled at a safe distance, although Brisbane to Byron may get a thorough drenching in the coming days.

      I’m of the belief Kew & BBC doth protest too loudly – as Nature always has the last word.

      230

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW

    Today’s Coffee and Covid newsletter on yesterday’s meeting at the White House

    https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/a-great-fall-saturday-march-1-2025?

    110

    • #
      Rowjay

      FWIW

      On December 5, 1994, leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Russian Federation met in Budapest, Hungary, to pledge security assurances to Ukraine in connection with its accession to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a non-nuclear-weapons state. The signature of the so-called Budapest Memorandum concluded arduous negotiations that resulted in Ukraine’s agreement to relinquish the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal, which the country inherited from the collapsed Soviet Union, and transfer all nuclear warheads to Russia for dismantlement. The signatories of the memorandum pledged to respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity and inviolability of its borders, and to refrain from the use or threat of military force. Russia breached these commitments with its annexation of Crimea in 2014 and aggression in eastern Ukraine, bringing the meaning and value of security assurance pledged in the Memorandum under renewed scrutiny.

      I can understand why Ukrainian leaders might have been a little reticent in signing away national mineral wealth.

      109

      • #
        KP

        …the mice get trampled when the elephants fight..

        There is no way for a small country to win when they are just a battleground for bigger ones.

        120

      • #
        Forrest Gardener

        Very interesting Rowjay.

        From 1994 to 2014 the USA, UK and Russia did apparently respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity.

        In modern history that’s a fairly long time. Did the signatories really expect the agreement to hold forever and ever, no matter what, cross my heart and hope to die?

        And what did each of the signatories do which led the agreement being set aside? Did something happen inside the Ukraine at the behest of the USA and the UK? Or did Putin just wake up one morning and decide it would be a great idea to get the band back together?

        100

      • #
        Graeme No.3

        Rawjay:
        So Russia didn’t attack Ukraine for 20 years by your reckoning? Until after the democratic elected President was deposed in a coup? After the massacre of Russian and other minorities? After Ukraine expressed a desire to join NATO? And wanted to have control of the Black Sea Fleet?
        As for Crimea, that was where opinions might differ – not formerly connected to Ukraine and a Russian icon where they had fought bloody battles (and 98% Russians there).
        This was was set up to destroy Russia and that plan has gone wrong. Zelenskyy trying to get back Ukrainian territory & more by annoying the strongest backer and thinking bankrupt England and Germany will back him in a continuing war (with what?). Who wants the war to continue?
        I can understand why Russian leaders might be a little reticent in signing any agreement.

        220

        • #
          el+gordo

          On the question of Crimea, the soft underbelly, Erdogan will make sure its returned to Ukraine. He is buoyed up by getting the PKK in Turkey to lay down their arms, so now he can devote full time to this other festering sore.

          28

        • #
          Rowjay

          Until after the democratic elected President was deposed in a coup?

          There is a difference between “eastern” democracies and “western” ones – western ones have a functioning opposition.

          As for Crimea, that was where opinions might differ

          OK – the west appeared to cede Crimea to Russia, or didn’t particularly care. The point is the Russians didn’t stop there.

          38

        • #

          I do not have an X account but was able to open and run the video underlined Got it from https://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2025/03/trump-on-warmongering.html I think
          A seven minute video in which Jeffrey Sachs explains how we got to where we are in Ukraine. A lot of people need to hear this but unfortunately, the ones who need to hear at the most are the automatons who won’t listen to anything but legacy media
          https://x.com/_I_Am_One_/status/1893859279221698905
          It seems Prof Sachs has an advisor to US presidents and the executive. It seems he knows what he is talking about.

          90

      • #
        theotherross

        The US and Nato under George Bush Jr Pledged to Russia that there would be no more movement eastwards towards Russia. Soon after Nato added another 7 countries bordering Russia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Romania. They also cancelled the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty. There is a great Tucker Carlson Interview with Jeffery Sachs (Tulsi Gabbard Confirmation) that details 30 years of Nato provocation.

        130

    • #
      RickWill

      Really interesting situation.

      NATO heavyweights Macron and Starmer come ahead to soften the Trump administration on defending allies that choose to defend Ukraine and Zelensky thinks he no longer needs to deal with Trump. He thought he could get guarantees from USA without giving anything in return.

      Ukraine now has two powerful enemies, That usually does not end well particularly when its friends have condemned their economies to oblivion.

      180

      • #
        Forrest Gardener

        And the people of the Ukraine still have at least 4 powerful enemies if you include Zelensky, and the forces inside Europe who want the fighting to continue.

        Those who favour the fighting to continue clearly are not familiar with the writings of Sun Tzu. And in the meantime the Chinese government appears highly conversant with the Art of War.

        100

        • #
          Rowjay

          Those who favour the fighting to continue

          Zelensky clearly does not want the fighting to continue. The problem is that he does not fully understand the Trump proposal. You have to remember that when elected in 2019, he only had a few english words in his vocabulary. Fast forward to 2025, and he is conversing well with the English and the Europeans, but he has had limited exposure to American English. During the White House meeting, he clearly had no idea why playing with cards entered the conversation as he only had a literal understanding of the term. Unlike FDR during WW2, the Trump administration did not embed an envoy in the beleaguered country to properly explain the subtleties of the proposal.

          The gentleman below would have been perfect.
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wFx3WSVdm8

          17

          • #
            RickWill

            You can cut Zelenskyy some slack for his potential misunderstanding but showing up to the Whitehouse for an important meeting with the POTUS is not going to win friends and influence the host favourably.

            I thought Zelenskyy may have a penchant for some sort of Cossack attire but he is quite accustomed to wearing a suit. This is how Zelenskyy was attired for addressing the UN:
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KDFHFstf0M

            30

      • #
        el+gordo

        If you have a few minutes, Jeffrey Sachs is outstanding.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9V-UtD3flY

        71

        • #
          RickWill

          Basically he is suggesting Europe to do what USA has done. Get Russia to a table and talk about mutual concerns. They do not need Ukraine at the table until the question of Ukraine becomes the central topic.

          80

          • #
            KP

            ” Get Russia to a table and talk about mutual concerns. ”

            That would come down to trade with Russia, and cheap energy from them. With American companies pulled out of Russia the Europeans have a chance to export to the 140million customers there, and certainly cheaper gas than they pay the Yanks.

            All they have to do is ditch Ukraine, and I’m sure their own internal problems with racism, immigration, ruinables failure and collapsing economies will make that decision easier.

            If Trump saves America by moving to the Right, Europe will get left behind as a second-world region.

            40

        • #

          Yes El Gordo. Great video
          Everyone should watch it. There is no one that has a better understanding.
          It was a talk to the European Parliament and gives the truth about US (democrat led CIA)

          30

    • #
      OldOzzie

      Well, Well – This is Interesting!

      Disaster in the Oval Office: Dems lead Zelensky, Ukraine off a cliff with pressure to reject mineral deal

      A common criticism of Volodymyr Zelensky’s disastrous Friday performance in the Oval Office is that he failed to read the room.

      Actually, the Ukrainian president did read a room — but it was the wrong room.

      Before meeting Trump, Zelensky met with anti-Trump Democrats who advised him to reject the terms of the mineral deal the president was offering, according to Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). “Just finished a meeting with President Zelensky here in Washington.

      He confirmed that the Ukrainian people will not support a fake peace agreement where Putin gets everything he wants and there are no security arrangements for Ukraine,” Murphy’s office posted on X at 11:15 a.m. Friday.

      He attached a picture of Zelensky at a conference table, with Murphy seated on the opposite side.

      Forty minutes later, Zelensky arrived at the White House, where Trump met his car, smiled, shook his hand and walked him into the Oval Office.

      The meeting, as the world now knows, quickly went off the rails and ended with Trump angrily ejecting the arrogant ingrate from the White House.

      The earlier meeting with Dems undercuts wild claims that Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance staged an ambush.

      In fact, it was Zelensky who came with an ulterior motive. The purpose of the meeting was to sign the mineral agreement he and Trump representatives had negotiated.

      He had twice refused to sign it after promising to, and thanks to Murphy, we now know he had no intention of signing it Friday. By listening to the nakedly partisan advice of Dems instead of dealing forthrightly with the current president, Zelensky betrayed his countrymen and, for now at least, leaves them without the military and diplomatic protection that only America can provide.

      130

  • #
    David Maddison

    Proven anti-TRUMP fake news by Reuters and Goolag etc..

    Before the US Presidential election the DemonRATs made anti-TRUMP fake news stories and Lamestream “news” outlets like Reuters ran them and Goolag ran them as “news” headlines. Goolag claims it was a “glitch” that their search engine interpreted these lies as news. An obvious lie.

    One example was a complete fabrication that TRUMP wanted a nation-wide abortion (for any reason) ban, to scare “low information” voters. It’s a state issue in any case. That explains why the Left constantly raised that issue during the election. Clearly TRUMP is pro-family and pro-children but he never said what was claimed.

    Totally Orwellian.

    The Left really are every bit as evil as you might think they are. And they and the fake news media are probably even worse than TRUMP thought they were.

    YouTube channel Liberal Hivemind discusses:

    https://youtu.be/fUQNdh2u6U8

    190

    • #
      Old Goat

      David,
      The MSM can print any lie (misinformation..) that they want and get away with it as long as someone has already said/printed it – the liability rests with the source . The source doesn’t matter . Its how lies become “fact”. Beware of labels – the “left” are “liberals” but you are using “liberal” hive mind for your point . As language is the medium that we use to convey message/meaning we have to be careful to be clear as our words can be misinterpreted . The truth is still however, the best defense…

      30

      • #
        David Maddison

        Old Goat, the YouTube channel Liberal Hivemind is a conservative one.

        Liberal is used in the US sense meaning of the Left, as it is a US channel, not in the sense of classical liberalism after contemporary writers like, Ayn Rand, Murray Rothbard, Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises, Thomas Sowell etc..

        The name is a reference to the criticism of Liberal/Left “collective consciousness”/groupthink (Hivemind).

        31

  • #
    David Maddison

    The guy in the following YouTube video is an extremely talented amateur scientist.

    In this video he makes purple gold, an alloy with aluminium:

    https://youtu.be/d6Pcp944sRI

    Here is his channel:

    https://youtube.com/@nilered?si=jyL3apIIgijEO5jd

    10

  • #
    David Maddison

    TRUMP is about to sign another executive order equally shocking for the Left as when he declared there are “only” two genders or when he banned men from women’s sports.

    He is about to make an EO that English is the official language of the United States for the purpose of official Government communications and for organisations in receipt of federal funding.

    It reverses an EO by Clinton that such organisations had to offer multiple foreign languages in their communications.

    The Left are in Meltdown.

    https://apnews.com/article/trump-declare-english-official-language-5b24f6ac1172803f615cea69e13f8724

    300

    • #
      Broadie

      I remember about 30 years ago the hispanic migrants complaining about their children were receiving a spanish language education in California when they had come to the USA to work hard and to give their children what they thought would be a English language education.
      In recent times, sacked IT workers living in mobile homes and cars say they are unable to return to a fall back of their old university student jobs in fast food etc: as they do not speak spanish and are unable to communicate with customers and fellow staff.

      80

  • #
    Peter C

    What has happened to Gee Aye?
    I first thought that he was still on extended University holidays, but first term is now underway and not a single snarky contribution
    Maybe he is under permanent moderation for repeated violations of comment policy?

    120

  • #
    David Maddison

    Why did Zelensky have to wear his Ninja outfit to the Oval Office, not a proper suit?

    What was he trying to prove?

    What a great disrespect to the United States people, who have given so much of their taxes to the Ukes, as well as TRUMP and JD.

    132

    • #
      KP

      He wouldn’t be recognised in a suit! Its all just part of the theatrics, like African dictators always in uniforms covered in medals and gold braid.

      210

      • #
        Old Goat

        KP,
        He is an actor dressed in what he thought would be appropriate for the role . Misread the room totally . No golden globe for him (or future either) . Trumps public statements are often contradictory and it’s hard for his opposition read what he’s up to . He has his chosen appointees in place so we will probably see where he is going from here on in .

        90

    • #
      RickWill

      What was he trying to prove?

      Others have suggested Zelenskyy had no intention of signing the minerals deal. Zelenskyy had been misled by Macron and Starmer that they could force USA to support NATO allies in their defence of Ukraine. Trump knows that Putin is smart enough to see EU peace keeping forces as NATO forces under another name. Would guarantee escalation and clearly Trump views WW3 then looms and he is not having anything to do with that.

      Russia and USA both fought the Germans in WW2. When NATO was established, Ukraine was under Russian control. Ukraine has a complex history and its pre 2014 state only came into existence in 1991 when USSR was broken up.

      At least Trump has relieved USA taxpayers from funding death and destruction in Ukraine. France, UK and Germany can continue to supply arms but they may find themselves facing Russia without support from USA if they provoke Putin by sending troops into Ukraine.

      To my mind, I believe Zelenskyy caused Putin’s angst when he went after NATO treaty. And Trump has been clear in taking that off the table.

      Zelenskyy is now in the tough position on deciding how much of his empire he concedes to Putin. He is not giving any mineral rights to USA in returns for any more weapons.

      Putin has what he wants. He brought the NATO question to a head and will get some land in return for the lost lives.

      You could see the embarrassment on the face of the Ukraine ambassador when Zelenskyy was being so disrespectful. She was like a school teacher being amabarssed by the behaviour of a pupil. However Zelenskyy will garner some support at home and in Europe for standing up to Trump. That will prolong the war but it will further hurt Europe economically. The inevitable new patriot administrations will be less inclined to support Ukraine.

      Trump is ahead of the game. He has talked to Putin and can see Putin;’s side. With USA and Russia re-establishing ties, they may come to some settlement over Ukraine. They may make a formal agreement that USA will never allow Ukraine to join NATO.

      180

      • #
        KP

        ” France, UK and Germany can continue to supply arms but they may find themselves facing Russia without support from USA if they provoke Putin by sending troops into Ukraine.”

        They’ve been the cheering fanboys for more and bigger weapons for ages, and seemed to have missed the memo when Putin drew the lines and said that countries supplying certain arms would be declaring war on Russia & he reserved the right to hit those countries supplying those arms.

        Maybe Trump will just let them go ahead and walk away when the Oreshniks hit arms factories in the UK, Germany and France. I can’t see Macron or Starmer calling up all the Muslim immigrants to put boots on the ground against the Russians, it will be interesting to see how far they will push it.

        60

        • #
          yarpos

          All those countries have depleted arsenals, depleted militaries, woked up populations that dont want to fight to keep them in power and wealthy. They have very little power to act on their bluster. They may cause Russia point pain with missile supply, but I seriously doubt any of them can change the course of the war.

          I think its best summed up by a cartoon I saw recently with Macron depicted as a yapping poodle in a Napoleon hat trying to intimidate a very large Russian bear 10 times his size.

          40

        • #
          Graeme No.3

          With the financial problems in the UK, Germany and France all they can do is whistle past the graveyard of their previous strength.

          20

    • #
      Engineer1

      The exchange in the Oval Office between the two presidents has been the subject of much hand wringing an angst by many commenters.

      After everyone settles down they might realize that this just a part of Trump’s long term strategy to get the rest of Europe to do the heavy lifting to support Ukraine instead of the USA.

      It’s already working since most of EU countries have already pledged support to Ukraine since the meeting.

      151

    • #
      Rowjay

      What was he trying to prove?

      When the press asked Zelensky why he didn’t wear a suit, he replied that he would once the war was over.

      He has always worn casual fatigues in his videos

      My thoughts are that he did not want to appear as “another suit” and out of touch with his people. It also helps when you have to spend long hours on the job in a war zone without a valet to take care of your kit.

      He actually did dress up for the White House – his top had buttons.

      52

      • #
        James Murphy

        Like any flying visit by senior management, Zelensky on the frontlines probably causes more problems than it solves, though I do appreciate the sentiment of such an action. I don’t think much of Zelensky generally, but this is more than I would expect from most politicians anywhere. The risks to life and limb are real.

        The East is a mess, as expected of a battlefront, but go West and things look pretty normal, though not many men around. There are videos by Ukrainians showing Ukrainians having a good time in bars and restaurants and living a normal life on city streets – ostensibly to show how resilient the people are.

        These attract a lot of ire from various directions because we are supposed to think they whole country has been flattened, apparently.

        40

  • #
    Sambar

    Meanwhile, here in Oz, our beloved prime minister has graciously announced that should he be voted back into the top job, he will help reduce the cost of living crisis by “freezing” the automatic tax increases on draught beer for two years. Not all alcoholic beverages, just draught beer. Sadly this move won’t be enough to change my voting preference.
    For any international readers, in Oz we do not use one cent coins any more, but this proposed “move” will save about one cent per pint of beer. The way the system works is if the cost of something is X and 1 or 2 cents the price is rounded down to X. If the cost of X is plus 3 cents then the price is rounded up to 5 cents.
    So what will this price freeze save me, well, nothing. The trick in all this of course is if you pay for your beer with a card, everything is transacted to the cent plus a transaction fee.
    Oh well, back to wondering how I will pay for my next electricity bill which the prime minister promised at the last election to reduce by $275 per year. My last bill, without any increases in consumption has increased by 40% over the last 3 years. Back to crying in my beer!

    290

    • #
      David Maddison

      Apart from that, Australia being an extreme Nanny State, already has among the highest alcohol taxes in the world, if not the highest.

      I don’t drink but I believe that in a pub (bar) the equivalent of a pint of beer, the classic working man’s drink, costs about $15 (US$9) due to the obscene “sin” taxes. A bottle of spirits like vodka or whisky costs about $50 (US$31). Not only that, manufacturers/importers in order to make the price of the overtaxed item more acceptable have reduced the standard bottle size from 750mls to 700mls and often the alcohol content from 40% to 37% as the tax is dependent on alcohol content.

      It’s best to make your own, although if too many people do that, they’ll ban that as well. And for spirits it’s only legal to own a still with a capacity of up to one litre of “wash”. DIY kits for beer and spirits are available from specialist stores. Naturally, it would be illegal to sell any untaxed product you make, personal use only.

      100

    • #
      yarpos

      We find it easier to pay a flat amount into our electricity account each month. I summer we go into credit due to panels, and that gets chewed up over winter. Sometimes I need to pay a little extra at the end of winter. Avoids the bill shock that affects some people.

      30

  • #
    Geoff from Tanjil

    I like Johnny Cash music and this popped up on my YouTube. I reckon this will put a smile on your face. Happy Sunday everyone, I’m off to explore central Victoria then Flinders ranges and maybe loop across to Dubbo.
    Quidan Productions https://youtu.be/PbfiRekc4RA?si=s4BWDfh5N_xDyzQI

    90

  • #
    KP

    The heads of the Hard Left are exploding after Trump told Zelensky how it will be. SMH is having a field day..

    “The macho men who bootlick Trump show us what weakness looks like-Some of the richest men in the world are genuflecting to the re-elected US president. It’s a pathetic parade of toadyism.”

    “Zelensky gets a hero’s welcome in London ahead of emergency summit.-The Ukrainian president and British PM Keir Starmer embraced outside Downing Street as Europe rallied around the wartime leader after his Oval Office bust-up with Donald Trump.”

    “As tempers and egos started to clash, Vance lit the match.-The air in the Oval Office was thick with resentment when Vice President J.D. Vance lit the match”

    “Albanese, Europeans back Zelensky after explosive White House meeting”

    “Zelensky asked Vance a question – it proved a mistake”

    “Five minutes to midnight’: New-look America sets clock ticking for Europe”

    ..and one from George Brandis, apparently a former high commissioner, so a practised liar.

    “Trump’s behaviour reveals what he thinks about the US’s role in the world.- …Trump’s petulance, and his evident personal disdain for Zelensky, make it difficult to watch the exchange without cringing….From that point, first Vance, then Trump, berates Zelensky with increasingly excitable belligerence, as Zelensky – patiently and without discourtesy – stands his ground…It was Trump and Vance, not Zelensky, who were disrespectful, …Trump behaved less like an American president than a Roman emperor dressing down a visiting barbarian chieftain…A security guarantee from Trump would not be worth the paper it is written on, particularly since…Trump’s sympathies lie with Putin anyway.”

    Any talk of American ‘security guarantees’ is just someone trying to get America into WW3 with Russia, because that is where it would end up. ‘Ukraine’ is 404, as the Russians call it, a country that no longer exists, Zelensky too.

    https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/trump-s-behaviour-reveals-what-he-thinks-about-the-role-of-the-us-in-the-world-20250301-p5lg57.html?js-chunk-not-found-refresh=true

    91

    • #
      TedM

      Did they watch the same 49 minutes that I did?

      130

    • #
      Forrest Gardener

      Indeed. There are a whole host of miscreants who mistakenly believe it is in their interests for Russia and the USA to be at each other’s throats.

      Trump’s recent discussions with Russia suggest he is once again ahead of the game.

      70

      • #
        KP

        Do you think he will declare peace on Russia while he tackles China, a more difficult opponent. He is keen to get Europe to own the Ukraine conflict, freeing up American resources for the Pacific.

        A broke USA can only spread its military so thin and then it loses effectiveness.

        20

        • #
          Forrest Gardener

          My crystal ball isn’t up to predicting what will happen next, but to partially address your question Trump does appear to have a plan of action.

          So far it appears shenanigan free and remarkably well adapted to disappointing those who play shenanigans against him.

          Time will tell.

          30

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW – copied

    “”For those that missed it, Recap;
    1966: Oil Gone in Ten years
    1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975
    1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide
    1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989
    1970: World Will use Up All its Natural Resources by 2000
    1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985
    1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable
    1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish
    1970s: Killer Bees!
    1970: Ice Age By 2000
    1970: America Subject to Water Rationing by 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980
    1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030
    1972: New Ice Age BY 2070
    1972: Oil Depleted 20 Years
    1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
    1974: Another Ice Age?
    1974: Ozone Depletion a Great Peril to Life
    1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines Imminent
    1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s
    1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend
    1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes
    1980: Peak Oil In 2000
    1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s
    1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
    1988: Maldive Islands will Be underwater by 2018 (they’re not)
    1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000
    1989: New York City’s West Side Underwater by 2019 (it’s not)
    1996: Peak Oil in 2020
    2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is
    2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
    2002: Peak Oil in 2010
    2004: Britam will Be Siberia by 2024
    2005: Manhattan underwater 2015
    2006: Super Hurricanes!
    2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018
    2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
    2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles we Have 96 Months to Save
    2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to Save The Planet From Catastrophe
    2009: Climate Genius AI Gore Moves 2013 prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
    2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015
    2014; Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos
    2019: Hey Greta, we need you to convince them it’s really going to happen
    this time” ”

    “Don’t you see? We fixed all these by raising taxes. Just narrowly escaped disaster each time. “

    330

    • #
      Greg in NZ

      Oh my gosh, it’s as if my whole life flashed before my eyes – except for the memorable good fun naughty bits. Thanks another ian, just goes to show how resilient robust sustainable & adaptable we are on this journey moving forward blah…

      Methinks the planet will be around for a little while longer than the purple-haired doom monsters.

      150

      • #
        John F. Hultquist

        the purple-haired doom monsters.
        There is a cartoon with R. F. Kennedy, now head of HHS, where he says his people will be investigating blue hair dye (purple works too) because the chemicals appear to cause mental illness.

        90

    • #
      wal1957

      Excellent.
      Myself, and I think many others, stopped taking notice of predictions by eggspurts many years ago. Your list explains why.

      I recently watched a short clip with an audience member from a tv chat show.
      I think the show was British.
      The female audience member stated something along the lines of…
      “I have always been pro vaccine, had flu shots every year and gratefully cued up for the Covid vaccine. However after all the lies have been revealed about Covid I will never willingly agree to have a vaccine under those circumstances again. Our government and health professionals told us lies.”

      Just like the meejia, our governments and health professionals have destroyed any faith/trust that the public had in them. And it was all self inflicted.

      180

    • #
      another ian

      WUWT also has a list –

      “Failed Prediction Timeline”

      https://wattsupwiththat.com/failed-prediction-timeline/

      12 pages!

      60

    • #
      MeAgain

      I like this guy’s take.

      Net Zero for energy generation is already done – any carbon generating electricity production is well offset by all the solar panels and wind turbines that are there, if you include those off grid.

      Tell them this crises is averted already.

      00

  • #
    David Maddison

    Comment on Zelensky meating by Rudy Giuliani, via email.

    What we saw in the White House the other day was a disgrace—an absolute disgrace. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stood there, in front of the media, sparring with President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance like he’s some kind of equal. Let me tell you something: he’s not.

    This is the leader of a nation that’s been on life support for years, kept alive by the blood, sweat, and hard-earned dollars of the American people. And what does he do? He shows no respect—no gratitude—for the leaders of the country that’s been carrying him. It’s outrageous!

    From the jump, Zelensky walked into the Oval Office with an entitled attitude, like the United States owes him something. He’s been getting a free ride from Biden and the other spineless Democrats for too long, and President Trump—God bless him—finally put his foot down. It was a beautiful thing to see. Trump told Zelensky straight to his face: no more blank checks, no more Biden handouts. The days of coddling are over. There’s a new sheriff in town, and his name is Donald J. Trump. Zelensky didn’t like it? Too bad. He’s lucky he even got a meeting.

    Vance, that man is a patriot. He called out Zelensky without hesitation as soon as he took a combative tone, challenging him on “what kind of diplomacy” JD was talking about in front of the cameras like some kind of grandstanding publicity stunt. This is where the meeting went down hill and it was Zelensky who prompted it.

    The Ukrainian president is a vassal, biting the hand that feeds him while billions of our tax dollars prop up his war. Vance isn’t afraid to say what we’re all thinking—America First means our borders, our cities, our people come before some endless sinkhole in Eastern Europe.

    Let’s get real – Ukraine’s been a mess—a disastrous war dragging on for years—and who’s been bankrolling it? You, me, every American taxpayer. Zelensky should’ve walked into that room with one phrase on his lips: “Thank you.” Thank you to Trump, thank you to Vance, thank you to every single one of us who’ve kept his country from collapsing. Instead, he picks a fight, whining about Trump’s plan to end the war in a day. Trump could do it—nobody negotiates like him. But Zelensky? He’d rather keep the gravy train rolling than face reality.

    I cleaned up New York when it was a war zone itself. You don’t fix problems by begging for handouts—you roll up your sleeves and get tough. Trump gets that. Vance gets that. Zelensky doesn’t. He’s been spoon-fed by Biden’s weak-kneed crew, and now he’s shocked there’s a new boss in the Oval Office who won’t play along. Trump put him in his place, and it was about time. No more free rides, pal. You want our help? Show some respect—or figure it out on your own.

    This clash wasn’t just a spat; it was a wake-up call. America’s back, and we’re not here to be Ukraine’s ATM. Zelensky better learn quick: Trump and Vance aren’t messing around. They’re here to win—for us, not him.

    171

    • #
      Vladimir

      As a realist, I say: normal people lost that round.

      Now stop gloating and think about your own country – not Ukraine, Greenland or Palestine.
      Speaking of which, some people here are ardent supporters of Israel. Consider for a second that Trump does a 180 degree turn there because Bibi looked inappropriately at you know who…
      I am serious – POTUS and his VP broke all imaginable formal protocols and hosts decency but amidst discussion of $500B deals and “millions killed” they found a spot to berate Ze for bad costume !

      518

      • #
        Rowjay

        “millions killed”

        There will be if Putin gets control of Ukraine. His troops had bad form during the initial Kiev invasion – imagine what the retribution would be like after three years of all-out war.

        All of a sudden, death and suffering doesn’t matter to Trump any more – not his problem. Isolationism rules.

        410

        • #
          KP

          “There will be if Putin gets control of Ukraine”

          Why would he want it? It would only be trouble for him the moment he goes West of Kiev. He wants the Russian-speakers back as part of Russia and knows full well Bandera’s Western Ukies were on the wrong side in WW2. He’s better to take Eastern Ukraine and leave the Western side on permanent life support from Europe.

          30

        • #
          yarpos

          Good grief do you really believe that? have you looked and the rapid rejuvenation and civil works being carried out in eastern Ukraine. This is just more of Russia as the great Baba Yaga which is then used to justify anything.

          41

  • #
    Greg in NZ

    Further to my comment at #2.3 earlier,

    (via RNZ/ABC/CCC/UN) Australian Senior Meteorologist Felim Hanniffy explained ‘warm sea temperatures’ caused TC Alfred (Cat 2) to ‘linger’ longer than usual… and there I was claiming NZ’s blocking high was the cause célèbre… experts huh.

    Townsville got to enjoy a little 4.4 wobble last night at 9.30pm, a very minor shake, yet waiting on the ‘senior experts’ to explain how man caused not only Alfred but now also earthquakes at the same time – shocking!

    NZ’s capital, Wellington, suffered a heat spike last night when three (3) separate electric scooters simultaneously ignited requiring the Fire Service to attend. Green Fiery Toxic Destruction – to save the planet no less.

    Fun Sunday rant over 😃

    152

  • #
    David Maddison

    It bothers me that so may supporters of Dutton of the fake conservative Liberal Party say that you have to wait until AFTER the election (assuming he is elected) to hear his true policies, which will ideally be anti-woke and pro-energy.

    He has already restated his commitment to the Paris Accords, even after TRUMP withdrew.

    I think it’s an extremely dangerous gamble to wonder if he’ll withdraw after the election.

    If he was the prospective PM that Australia wants and needs, he would have the cajones to say what he thinks NOW.

    He won’t even commit on gender issues:

    https://www.familyfirstparty.org.au/dutton_walks_back_comments_on_gender

    While Dutton made no commitments, he sent signals that he might act if he becomes Prime Minister.

    https://www.familyfirstparty.org.au/the_trump_non_effect_dutton_stays_in_paris_squibs_gender_question

    The “Trump effect” has had little effect on Peter Dutton.

    Families will continue to pay the Paris premium on their electricity bills under a Coalition Government.

    And Dutton has dodged a question about committing to two genders.

    He’s weak and lacks moral clarity.

    It’s pathetic.

    160

    • #
      wal1957

      I agree 100% with your assessment.
      It’s an own goal by Dutton and the “conservative” Liberal party.

      70

    • #
      John Michelmore

      Agreed, unless Dutton comes out with concrete primises it will be a NO from me,

      10

      • #
        Peter C

        Well it won’t be an outright NO from me. Libs are still the least worse option before Labor,Teals and Greens, but that doesn’t mean they get my first preference, or even 2 or 3.
        Didn’t waste your vote. Get maximum strategic value by voting for minor parties that actually reflect your views as 1 and 2. Worst case your vote will flow to the Libs if the minors don’t get up.

        20

  • #
    Joe

    No. He is restricted by the traitors in his party.
    There are two elections going on,
    1. The election to determine which party governs Australia.
    2. The election to determine which faction governs the party.

    We, the people, should vote down every left leaning party representative put forth by the party in elections.
    Only then will the party reflect conservative values.
    But we are not given that information at the voting booth.

    120

    • #
      Peter C

      Exactly right. We are not given that information at the voting booth. Some research is required.
      Hopefully discussion right here on this blog will flesh out some of the best voting options.

      20

  • #
    David Maddison

    Here is an excellent short video from PragerU about whether the United States was founded on “stolen land”.

    The points raised are equally applicable to Australia as well.

    https://www.prageru.com/video/are-we-living-on-stolen-land

    20

  • #
    David Maddison

    Excellent video from Paul Joseph Watson demonstrating that Starmer was lying about the state of free speech in Once Great Britain.

    https://youtu.be/DD7wmjp4ZKs

    60

  • #
    John Connor II

    Now, I don’t want to spread fear and panic, but…

    Everyone needs to do some SERIOUS self sufficiency and resilience work.
    NOW, if you haven’t already, before the masses panic buy, and they will.
    Cash, serious stocks of everything you need, power independence/backup systems.

    Martin A has posted the latest analyses and 2025 is the year history repeats with another world war. Everyone needs to read them all.

    This is right on schedule. In 1853, the French defeated Russia in the Crimea War. Add 86 years to that, and you come to 1939 with the start of World War II. Add another 86 years, and you come to 2025.

    I wish his models were wrong.
    Everythings dropping into place with my own 2028 timeline based on different data. Ukraine gone by then.
    How will Ukraine cease to be by then?
    Have a guess!

    Not convinced?

    BREAKING: German Foreign Minister Baerbock gave an impassioned speech to prepare Germans for war with Russia.
    Germany urges European nations to start mobilizing now and not wait for the formation of the incoming government in Germany under Chancellor Merz, expected in April.
    https://twitter.com/igorsushko/status/1895963707995476333

    Norway refuses to refuel US submarines.
    Military conscription in the UK.
    Deagle’s prediction for 2025 is back.
    The US/EU rift is forcing the EU’s hand and accelerating plans.
    Don’t be one of those with their fingers in their ears going “la la la la la”.

    22

  • #
    David Maddison

    Victor Davis Hanson comments on Ukraine:

    https://x.com/VDHanson/status/1895892571664343159

    Ten bad takeaways from the Zelenskyy blow-up

    1. Zelenskyy does not grasp—or deliberately ignores—the bitter truth: those with whom he feels most affinity (Western globalists, the American Left, the Europeans) have little power in 2025 to help him. And those with whom he obviously does not like or seeks to embarrass (cf. his Scranton, Penn. campaign-like visit in September 2024) alone have the power to save him. For his own sake, I hope he is not being “briefed” by the Obama-Clinton-Biden gang to confront Trump, given their interests are not really Ukraine’s as they feign.

    2. Zelenskyy acts as if his agendas and ours are identical. So, he keeps insisting that he is fighting for us despite our two-ocean-distance that he mocks. We do have many shared interests with Ukraine, but not all by any means: Trump wants to “reset” with Russia and triangulate it against China. He seeks to avoid a 1962 DEFCON 2-like crisis over a proxy showdown in proximity to a nuclear rival. And he sincerely wants to end the deadlocked Stalingrad slaughterhouse for everyone’s sake.

    3. The Europeans (and Canada) are now talking loudly of a new muscular antithesis, independent of the U.S. Promises, promises—given that would require Europeans to prune back their social welfare state, frack, use nuclear, stop the green obsessions, and spend 3-5 percent of their GDP on defense. The U.S. does not just pay 16 percent of NATO’s budget but also puts up with asymmetrical tariffs that result in a European Union trade surplus of $160 billion, plays the world cop patrolling sea-lanes and deterring terrorists and rogues states that otherwise might interrupt Europe’s commercial networks abroad, as well as de facto including Europe under a nuclear umbrella of 6,500 nukes.

    4. Zelenskyy must know that all of the once deal-stopping issues to peace have been de facto settled: Ukraine is now better armed than most NATO nations, but will not be in NATO; and no president has or will ever supply Ukraine with the armed wherewithal to take back the Donbass and Crimea. So, the only two issues are a) how far will Putin be willing to withdraw to his 2022 borders and b) how will he be deterred? The first is answered by a commercial sector/tripwire, joint Ukrainian-US-Europe resource development corridor in Eastern Ukraine, coupled with a Korea-like DMZ; the second by the fact that Putin unlike his 2008 and 2014 invasions has now lost a million dead and wounded to a Ukraine that will remain thusly armed.

    5. What are Zelenskyy’s alternatives without much U.S. help—wait for a return of the Democrats to the White House in four years? Hope for a rearmed Europe? Pray for a Democratic House and a 3rd Vindman-like engineered Trump impeachment? Or swallow his pride, return to the White House, sign the rare-earth minerals deal, invite in the Euros (are they seriously willing to patrol a DMZ?), and hope Trump can warn Putin, as he did successfully between 2017-21, not to dare try it again?

    70

    • #
      David Maddison

      CONTINUED

      6. If there is a cease fire, a commercial deal, a Euro ground presence, and influx of Western companies into Ukraine, would there be elections? And if so, would Zelenskyy and his party win? And if not, would there be a successor transparent government that would reveal exactly where all the Western financial aid money went?

      7. Zelenskyy might see a model in Netanyahu. The Biden Administration was far harder on him than Trump is on Ukraine: suspending arms shipments, demanding cease-fires, prodding for a wartime, bipartisan cabinet, hammering Israel on collateral damage—none of which Westerners have demanded of Zelenskyy. Yet Netanyahu managed a hostile Biden, kept Israel close to its patron, and when visiting was gracious to his host. Netanyahu certainly would never before the global media have interrupted, and berated a host and patron president in the White House.

      8. If Ukraine has alienated the U.S. what then is its strategic victory plan? Wait around for more Euros? Hold off an increasingly invigorated Russian military? Cede more territory? What, then, exactly are Zelenskyy’s cards he seems to think are a winning hand?

      9. If one views carefully all the 50-minute tape, most of it was going quite well—until Zelenskyy started correcting Vance firstly, and Trump secondly. By Ukraine-splaining to his hosts, and by his gestures, tone, and interruptions, he made it clear that he assumed that Trump was just more of the same compliant, clueless moneybags Biden waxen effigy. And that was naïve for such a supposedly worldly leader.

      10. March 2025 is not March 2022, after the heroic saving of Kyiv—but three years and 1.5 million dead and wounded later. Zelenskyy is no longer the international heartthrob with the glamorous entourage. He has postponed elections, outlawed opposition media and parties, suspended habeas corpus and walked out of negotiations when he had an even hand in Spring 2022 and apparently even now when he does not in Spring 2025.

      Quo vadis, Volodymyr?

      80

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW

    “Team Zelenskyy Has a “Security Guarantee” Plan to Recapture all Lost Ukraine Territory
    March 1, 2025 | Sundance | 293 Comments”

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/03/01/team-zelenskyy-has-a-security-guarantee-plan-to-recapture-all-lost-ukraine-territory/

    Well maybe not a dirty bomb yet then?

    30

    • #
      another ian

      And

      “**** Zelenskyy
      [Comments enabled]
      Oh this is rich.

      So after making a fool out of himself in the Oval Office — remember, Z allegedly told Rubio he was ready to sign the minerals deal with no conditions — he tried to renegotiate it on live television and add “security guarantees.”

      This was ****ing stupid. Europe is only standing behind Z at the moment because all their aid was a loan. If Z blows up and his government falls they get nothing and that’s a ****-ton of money. We, on the other hand, have a crap-ton of sunk cost with no return at this point and getting directly involved via any means is the sort of mistake that was made in WWI and WWII and if we do it this time we’re likely to get a nuclear war out of it. No thanks.

      Never mind that the US taxpayer has been funding his government. Its one thing to provide some guns and ammunition to a “friend” when they need it, but this evil ********** thinks we have an obligation to pay his government worker salaries and pensions on top of that. Where the hell did that “obligation” come from?”

      More at

      https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=252901

      130

      • #
        el+gordo

        ‘Europe is only standing behind Z at the moment …’

        The forward strategy is to push Russia out of Ukraine and that is achievable using conventional weapons.

        The US should pull out of NATO and all future arms deliveries paid for in advance at market prices.

        13

        • #
          Peter C

          Russia has not been pushed out of Ukraine yet. It has all been the other way.

          20

        • #
          Hanrahan

          No one will pay good money for obsolescent hand me downs. AFAIK the US has not given any F-16s and they are OLD.

          If Ukraine doesn’t use this stuff for what it was made – shooting at Russians – then the US will pay millions to decommission them.

          There is some stuff that is new and good – HIMARS rockets and Patriot missiles but that is overstated.

          00

    • #
      Rowjay

      Necessity is the mother of invention. As a result, the Ukrainians are redefining how modern ground wars are fought and it’s not pretty. They had to do it when congress held back traditional military support from Oct 23 to March 24, when they had to get creative to survive.

      These are people that you want on your side when the **** hits the fan.

      43

      • #
        yarpos

        They havent “redefined” anything. This just the nature of a near peer conflict in the drone, advanced ISR and precision missile and glide bomb era. Agree they are a courageous people , but sadly there are many less of them to stand by anyones side these days. Continuation of the conflict will be the end of Ukraine demographically , if not in a number of other ways.

        90

    • #
      another ian

      FWIW

      “Bipartisan Group of RINOs and Democrat Senators Met with Zelensky and Blew Smoke Up His A$$ Before He Met with Trump – Zelensky Releases Video where You Can See Clearly Who Participated”

      https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/bipartisan-group-rinos-democrat-senators-met-zelensky-blew/

      40

  • #
    SimonB

    https://www.9news.com.au/national/weather-news-autumn-heatwave-soaring-temperatures-march-australia/ce280b99-5e61-4686-a72e-7fc862916dde?ref=BP_RSS_ninenews_0_millions-of-aussies-to-swelter-through-early-autumn-heatwave_020325

    Report on March 2nd, 2025 about March 1st, the calendar first DAY of Autumn, despite millennia of documented acceptance that 22 March is the seasonal start of Autumn.
    Hottest SATURDAY in March in the hottest part of Australia, indicative of a heatwave they are FORECASTING?
    What happens when we come back in a month to view this week? Massive headlines of never eventuated? Or did the sparsely populated (for a reason) region ‘avoid the potential catastrophic effects’ of climate change this time?
    Come on Dutton, make this stop! This mainstream trash media are dancing bears, they’ll double down for a few months, weed out and ridicule the useful idiots with facts and they’ll save face by claiming they now have new information (readily and reliably available for decades) and they’ll change course.
    We’ve just seen it with CNN jake Tapper flogging a book claiming the cover up of Biden cognitive decline, despite him being vocal on air shouting down anyone pointing it out in 2020 and social media calling him Ole Dementia Joe from day one of his puppet show!
    Australia’s media hacks are no different, but break the hypnotic effect of Marxist propaganda and a few useful idiots still with the keys to the castle allow a wedge for the facts to be put in front of the faithful and erode that swing vote support for economic vandalism and societal chaos being wrought by global Marxist elites in Western countries.
    We can not suffer under this energy stupidity with the CCP electronically and literally circumnavigating Australia for weak spots, especially with the undeniable reality of our 7th straight quarter in recession, from Labor’s ‘world’s 2nd best treasurer’ claiming surpluses while they fund open border ‘guests’.

    80

  • #
    Hanrahan

    Are we being blasé re covid here? Can it be as deadly as claimed? Is the West more healthy than we give ourselves credit for? China has suffered, and still is, suffering terribly. Is our privilege™ showing?

    You don’t need to do an exhaustive search to find a mountain of evidence that they are depopulating at a rapid rate. Lei, a thoughtful lady, has been making the case that China’s population is nowhere near 1.4 bill as claimed, more like 800 mill and that 200-500 mill have died, including 5% of 35 to 44 year olds. If true, this is the greatest human tragedy and most catastrophic collapse economically of all time. Rome died slowly.

    https://youtu.be/gsIg-_5Yl_8?t=1138

    40

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW

    “Reuters: The Renewable Energy Transition has Failed”

    Report on Jo’s post at

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/03/01/reuters-the-renewable-energy-transition-has-failed/

    With lots of comments

    20

  • #
    Greg in NZ

    Enough of the borax, Poindexter, how hot is it?

    2 March 2025 (random sites):
    Arctic North Pole -17C
    Greenland Summit -31C
    Amundsen South Pole -46C & snowing
    Zugspitze Germany -12C
    Usual parts of Australia mid-40s
    Coastal parts 20-30s Celsius
    Parts of NZ 27C
    others mid-20s

    What, me worry? 😃

    50

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW – how it is done

    “Elon Musk Explains the ‘Non-Profit’ Grift That George Soros Has Been Running on the U.S. Government and Taxpayers (VIDEO)”

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/elon-musk-explains-non-profit-grift-that-george/

    Applicable in Oz?

    40

  • #
    el+gordo

    Coal still king in China.

    ‘Even as China’s clean energy surged in 2024 and became a key economic driver, solar and wind utilisation dropped sharply in Q4 2024, which was not expected or explained by weather conditions, and coal remains strong, which ultimately goes against President Xi’s 2021 pledge to phase down coal over the following five years.

    ‘China approved 66.7 gigawatts (GW) of new coal-fired power capacity in 2024, with approvals picking up in the second half after a slower start to the year.’ (Not alot of people know that)

    50

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW

    “And the wheel goes round, goes round”

    “Another Climate Hypocrite Gets a Big Climate Cult Gig”

    “UN Climate envoy and ex-Bank of England boss Mark Carney’s firm sold farms in Brazil linked to deforestation claims.

    The move comes despite his call on owners to fix rather than sell climate-damaging assets.”

    https://hotair.com/headlines/2025/03/01/another-climate-hypocrite-gets-a-big-climate-cult-gig-n3800328

    Moved his hat for a go at Prime Minister of Canada

    20

  • #
    another ian

    FWIW

    “Smack-Talking Europe Steps in It With Baltic States”

    “What a bunch of empty rhetoric elitists these Brussels-types and that socialist Starmer are.

    If you don’t fit their little Euro-mold perfectly, they’ll have meetings to tell you what they decided to do with you, sovereign country or no.”

    https://hotair.com/headlines/2025/03/01/smack-talking-europe-steps-in-it-with-baltic-states-n3800319

    30

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>